Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trousers?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I hope you mean you are offended at the image cause, I'm not trying to imply I think this shit is funny or acceptable. Nor would I want to offend you, Phenom or any other black person here.

    If something I did/said here offended you I am very sorry. That was not at all my intention. Quite the opposite. I'm ashamed of shit like this and I'm was barely even born when the picture was taken.

    Conditioning like this is meant to divide us so we can never unite and overpower those that seek to control us. I doubt I need to explain to anyone here that I definitely don't support that shit.
    Last edited by MadGypsy; 06-19-2017, 06:46 PM.

    Comment


    • #17
      So if a guy has his hands behind his back, he's necessarily under arrest? You've never casually adopted that pose? The, ahem, "construction worker" isn't taller than the black dude, it's the hat. Who said the black guy doesn't have a job? The whites' pants are nicer and their shirts fancier? It looks to me that the black man's pants and shirt are classier. His shirt may cost more but his overall outfit is cheaper. "Whitey outnumbers you" isn't a belief but a fact: blacks only amount to around 12% of the US pop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr..._and_ethnicity

      All this picture is conditioning me to believe is that they look ridiculous, and that the less ridiculous-looking of them is precisely the black man. I know you have a thing for conspiracy stuff but this is preposterous IMHO.
      ♪ I'm skiiiiiiinnin' in the pain, just skiiiiiiinnin' in the pain ♪
      ♪ What a glorious feelin' I'm haaaaaaappy again ♪

      Comment


      • #18
        I have created a monster.

        Racism. Why did we go there? We were having so much fun bashing on the gays, and then it turned into depressing white guilt. Seeing a black guy just sets some people off with the apologeticism. God damn chalky.

        Personally, nothing about the pic said "racist" to me. It did scream "candidate for a 1970's gay porn movie poster" though. The prosecution submits exhibit A into evidence, your honor.



        Was supposed to be a gay parody of that old Pam Grier movie, Black Mama, White Mama.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Focalor View Post
          nothing about the pic said "racist" to me. It did scream "candidate for a 1970's gay porn movie poster" though.
          Exactly. Magnum Johnson. Oboy...
          ♪ I'm skiiiiiiinnin' in the pain, just skiiiiiiinnin' in the pain ♪
          ♪ What a glorious feelin' I'm haaaaaaappy again ♪

          Comment


          • #20
            Is it racist to say all black guys have huge peckers? Maybe. But I think it's probably the kinda racism they're okay with.

            But back to the original pic... Yeah, I kinda glossed over the fact that Tank-Top Tony's "hat" was priced at 3 bucks. They were selling hard hats as a fashion statement? No way. Anyone old as shit here than can confirm or bust this myth? Because I can't imagine anyone, even in the tacky 70's, even the gayest Village People fan, having a hard hat in their hat collection as a point of fashion. That's just... SUUUUUUPER gay.

            Comment

            Working...
            X