Is it racist to say all black guys have huge peckers? Maybe. But I think it's probably the kinda racism they're okay with.
But back to the original pic... Yeah, I kinda glossed over the fact that Tank-Top Tony's "hat" was priced at 3 bucks. They were selling hard hats as a fashion statement? No way. Anyone old as shit here than can confirm or bust this myth? Because I can't imagine anyone, even in the tacky 70's, even the gayest Village People fan, having a hard hat in their hat collection as a point of fashion. That's just... SUUUUUUPER gay.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trousers?
Collapse
X
-
I have created a monster.
Racism. Why did we go there? We were having so much fun bashing on the gays, and then it turned into depressing white guilt. Seeing a black guy just sets some people off with the apologeticism. God damn chalky.
Personally, nothing about the pic said "racist" to me. It did scream "candidate for a 1970's gay porn movie poster" though. The prosecution submits exhibit A into evidence, your honor.
Was supposed to be a gay parody of that old Pam Grier movie, Black Mama, White Mama.
Leave a comment:
-
So if a guy has his hands behind his back, he's necessarily under arrest? You've never casually adopted that pose? The, ahem, "construction worker" isn't taller than the black dude, it's the hat. Who said the black guy doesn't have a job? The whites' pants are nicer and their shirts fancier? It looks to me that the black man's pants and shirt are classier. His shirt may cost more but his overall outfit is cheaper. "Whitey outnumbers you" isn't a belief but a fact: blacks only amount to around 12% of the US pop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr..._and_ethnicity
All this picture is conditioning me to believe is that they look ridiculous, and that the less ridiculous-looking of them is precisely the black man. I know you have a thing for conspiracy stuff but this is preposterous IMHO.
Leave a comment:
-
I hope you mean you are offended at the image cause, I'm not trying to imply I think this shit is funny or acceptable. Nor would I want to offend you, Phenom or any other black person here.
If something I did/said here offended you I am very sorry. That was not at all my intention. Quite the opposite. I'm ashamed of shit like this and I'm was barely even born when the picture was taken.
Conditioning like this is meant to divide us so we can never unite and overpower those that seek to control us. I doubt I need to explain to anyone here that I definitely don't support that shit.Last edited by MadGypsy; 06-19-2017, 07:46 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
you don't think that looks like 2 white dudes "handling" a hand-cuffed black man? Why are the white dudes posturing with their chests out, hands on hips/belt while the black guy is basically in a restrained pose? That image is practically subliminal conditioning.
If you were black back then the image is conditioning you to believe whitey outnumbers you and has more authority
If you were white back then the image is conditioning you to believe you are superior.
Seriously, put them in cop clothes and tell me that isn't an arrest. Actually, the white dudes are practically already in uniforms. The dude on the left "has a job". The dude on the right is practically already in cop pants and boots, and his shirt insinuates he has some form of "power to fight bad guys". Yet, the black guy is in regular street clothes standing in a restrained pose looking at the guy that resembles a cop and smiling over his arrest (conditioning to accept oppression). Both of the white people are made to be just a little taller than the black dude. Like Focalor said "who wears a construction hat and sandles?". Why does the black guy's shirt cost more in a time where black people definitely made less? Why is his shirt more but it isn't as "fancy" as the cheaper white guy clothes? Why are all the pants the same price but, the white people get "nicer" pants? Why doesn't the black guy get head gear?
You say "It's just an ad." How many more ads could be found in this time period with a similar subliminal message?Last edited by MadGypsy; 06-19-2017, 07:41 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I think you might be looking a tad too much into it, Gypsy. It sure looks gay AF but racist? More like flower-power-everyone-is-happy-in-Happyland to me...
Leave a comment:
-
That one pic looks super racist to me. Like the guy is saying
"Heeey colored fella. When you have rights you can literally wear anything you want."
and the black dude is like
"I'm learning from the white folks. Imma get me some freedoms one day. Thanks, non-threatening, handcuffs pose."
IE.. that shit looks condescending as fuck.
You could literally change nothing but the white guys outfits to police uniforms and the only thing that would be confusing is why is the black dude smiling.Last edited by MadGypsy; 06-19-2017, 04:35 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
The first pic... put your thumb over the flowery blouse guys head and ask someone nearby if it's a man or a small breasted woman. ZING!
Leave a comment:
-
Muhahahahahahahahaha!!! You gotta love the Supermouse tee as well...
♫ Young man, there's no need to feel down, I said young man... ♫
Leave a comment:
-
Aren't ads fun? WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY LOOKING AT!?! Who stands that close to another man? Does his daughter know he borrowed her blouse?
Who the fuck wears a hardhat with flip flops? I appreciate your drive to become a fashion pioneer, Bruce, but I think this is one trend that has very little chance of catching on. Notice the black guy in the middle. He's smart. He's covering his butthole in case one of the two fägs beside him tries anything funny. They might not be gay? Twaddle and shite, I say. No self respecting straight man wears a tank top or a mighty mouse shirt THAT tight.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: