Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Modified H5N1, world to be owned soon.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Modified H5N1, world to be owned soon.




    Image credit: Diego Cupolo


    Five tweaks of the H5N1 virus is all it takes to turn it in to one of the most deadly ever flu strains.

    Like something from a horror movie the killer virus is so dangerous that if it ever got out it could cause untold devastation and death. Unsurprisingly the research has generated a great deal of controversy and criticism, with lead scientist Ron Fouchier fearing a substantial backlash for creating it. "I can't think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one," said Paul Keim, chairman of the U.S National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity.

    The deadly virus is a genetically tweaked version of the H5N1 bird flu strain, but is far more infectious and could pass easily between millions of people at a time. The research has caused a storm of controversy and divided scientists, with some saying it should never have been carried out.
    Last edited by Mindf!3ldzX; 12-06-2011, 06:52 AM.
    Want to get into playing Quake again? Click here for the Multiplayer-Startup kit! laissez bon temps rouler!


  • #2
    We'd all be scared if we knew all they were creating in their labs to "protect" us!

    Comment


    • #3
      not sure if this is just as bad, or worse than nuclear weapons.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mindf!3ldzX View Post
        ...said Paul Keim...
        Keim means germ in german.

        Comment


        • #5
          Fuck science. Also, it's pretty dumb of them to tell everybody how easy it is...
          Scout's Journey
          Rune of Earth Magic

          Comment


          • #6
            Has hollywood not teached scientists anything???!!!

            note: source plz!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by The International Journal of Life Science Methods
              Modified H5N1 Virus Stirs Debate
              12/02/2011 Rachelle Dragani

              Dutch researchers have made the deadly influenza virus more easily transmissible between ferrets. Now the scientific community is debating whether it’s responsible to publish such studies.

              A submitted paper that describes a modified strain of the avian H5N1 virus has the scientific community discussing the dangers of publishing science that could be used for bioterrorism.

              In the paper submitted to Science, Dutch scientist Ronald Fouchier and his team at Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands report that by transferring a strain of H5N1 from ferret to ferret, the virus evolves to adapt to each host. The virus’ normal mechanism for transmission is via bodily secretions, but Fouchier and colleagues found that the virus became capable of airborne transmission after only 10 generations in the experiment.



              Dutch researchers have made the deadly influenza virus more easily transmissible between ferrets. Source: Flickr, USFWS Mountain Prairie


              Because ferrets and humans share a similar immunity to the H5N1 virus, some are concerned that the strain could be just as contagious among humans as the common flu. While the common flu is relatively harmless to otherwise healthy people, it still kills thousands each year so a H5N1 strain capable of airborne transmission has the potential to be much more deadly. Wild H5N1 strains currently aren’t easily transmissible among people; most cases occur from contact with infected birds.
              “There’s not a threat from this research necessarily, but the threat from bioterrorism is real. The risk is real,” said biosecurity expert Barry Kellman from DePaul University.

              Because this research could possibly be used as a biological weapon, research regulators and scientists are in a precarious position. While a study detailing the aggressive human transmission of the virus could be crucial for preventative measures in the event of an attack, that same published information could lead to an attack as well.

              As a result, a US panel of national security and scientific research experts are reviewing the paper. The National Security Advisory Board on Biosecurity is investigating the paper but isn’t commenting on it at this time. While the group doesn’t have the authority to ban the paper’s publication, its recommendations could discourage some journals from publishing the research.

              But while the US has a system in place, there is no international guidelines or review system for responding to research that could potentially have dangerous applications, leaving a vulnerability in biosecurity.

              “We’ve gone forward on the basis that all the really cutting-edge research is done in the US, and therefore if we have controls that’s sufficient, but that’s nonsense. This research is happening all over the world and if we don’t think about these problems we might be building a dam out of a sieve,” said Kellman.

              When the NSABB will make their recommendation or when Science will make its decision on publication remain unknown. Fouchier hasn’t made any comments about what he will do if the paper is rejected and has not responded to requests for comments.

              “We need to think as a policy matter how we’re going to deal with this. We have domestically, but we haven’t globally, and here’s the proof of the inadequacy of that approach,” said Kellman.
              Source : BioTechniques - Modified H5N1 Virus Stirs Debate
              Want to get into playing Quake again? Click here for the Multiplayer-Startup kit! laissez bon temps rouler!

              Comment

              Working...
              X