Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mw3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bloodshot
    replied
    Also, Skyrim is way behind the curve in graphics technology. They just started implementing shader effects that were introduced in 2007 - and on top of that, haven't even optimized them that well. If you look at any games that have developers who know how to code for their graphics engines like Crytek, ID, Epic, or DICE, MW3 looks like it had no effort put into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadowswift
    replied
    well, lets look at things rationally before going on a witch hunt. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare came out in 2007, four years ago. The graphics on that game back then blew my fucking mind. However, if you look at the graphics on that game and compair them to, lets say, Skyrim, which just came out a month ago, the graphics are easily compairable. CoD4 was way ahead of it's time. Hard to improve on something so high up. Not to say that it can't be done, it's just not easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForestMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Mindf!3ldzX View Post
    As if Quake had anything more to offer, Forestman.....
    I know, it's why I never play sp and when i play mp I'm not out after a good story and good gameplay... I'm want to kill other players
    But still it dosn't change that what I said about mw3 is less true or should be more acepted

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloodshot
    replied
    Which is why we play the older Quakes...

    And besides, at least newer quakes have better graphics - MW3 looks the same as MW2, which looked the same as CoD 4.

    Not to say CoD isn't fun, but it's really dumb how they barely change a thing about the game, and people shell out 60$.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mindf!3ldzX
    replied
    As if Quake had anything more to offer, Forestman.....

    Leave a comment:


  • ForestMan
    replied
    Those new CoD games should be called for what they are- a expansion pack. Everything is amloust the same only the maps are new. After playing 2 first expansions I got tyried on how predictable game is. Every single map is all about: short breefing, run, 100 enemies soldier, run litle more, 100 enemies, run litle more, blow something in the air, more running, then escape while 100 enemies are runing after you.....

    Leave a comment:


  • R00k
    replied
    I bought BattleField3, nice GFX, decent online play, takes a rig u bought last year at least to run.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloodshot
    replied
    I gave up on CoD after MW2. MW1, CoD 1 and CoD UO are the best CoD games.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mindf!3ldzX
    replied
    I'm having trouble hoisting the color's on this WiFi connection.....

    so, I'm stuck at port sippin on rum.




    ARRRGGGG, back to me rum...

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadowswift
    replied
    I have it for PS3...for whatever reason, I have not even opened it yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnRocker
    replied
    Well i played black ops before i played mw2.. some friends of mine are big into mw2 so i tried it... i hated it! i thought black ops was way better! BUT... Now that im used to MW.. i love mw3.. takes time to adjust to the different game but its good. You should get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phenom
    replied
    Hows MW3 compared to Black Ops? seriously, I've been wanting to buy this game.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnRocker
    started a topic Mw3

    Mw3

    I've been out of the quake loop since i haven't bothered to get another desktop but have been playing mw3.. if anyone wants to play, add me.. xbox live name: Plested
    cyazz
Working...
X